Re: pg_recvlogical --endpos - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Okano, Naoki
Subject Re: pg_recvlogical --endpos
Date
Msg-id 0B4917A40C80E34BBEC4BE1A7A9AB7E277B59C@g01jpexmbkw05
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_recvlogical --endpos  (Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: pg_recvlogical --endpos
List pgsql-hackers
On Wednesday, November 30, 2016 10:34 AM Craig Ringer wrote:
>On 30 November 2016 at 09:18, Okano, Naoki <okano(dot)naoki(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>> On November 29, 2016 at 5:03 PM Craig Ringer wrote:
>>> Would it be better rephrased as "--endpos can only be used with --start" ?
>> OK. I think this phrase is better than the previous phrase.
>>
>>>> The patch should allow --endpos to work with --create-slot.
>>>
>>> How? It doesn't make sense with --create-slot .
>> This patch is updated to incorporate Alvaro's changes shown below, isn't it?
>> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20160503180658.GA59498%40alvherre.pgsql
>> I thought that the consent in community was taken with this specification...
>>> I could not find any mention that it did not make sense with --create-slot.

> What would --endpos with --create-slot do?

Sorry, I was misunderstanding. you are right.
I have noticed that --endpos doesn't make sense unless it is with --start.
I checked --endpos works with --create-slot and --start.
So, there is no problem with this patch.

Regards,
Okano Naoki
Fujitsu

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: Remove the comment on the countereffectiveness of large shared_buffers on Windows
Next
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: patch: function xmltable