From: Tsunakawa, Takayuki [mailto:tsunakawa.takay@jp.fujitsu.com]
> From: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI [mailto:horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp]
> > + if (setsockopt(conn->sock, IPPROTO_TCP, TCP_USER_TIMEOUT,
> > + (char *) &timeout, sizeof(timeout)) < 0 && errno !=
> > ENOPROTOOPT)
> > + {
> > + char sebuf[256];
> > +
> > + appendPQExpBuffer(&conn->errorMessage,
> > + libpq_gettext("setsockopt(TCP_USER_TIMEOUT)
> > failed: %s\n"),
> >
> > I suppose that the reason ENOPROTOOPT is excluded from error
> > condition is that the system call may fail with that errno on
> > older kernels, but I don't think that that justifies ignoring the
> > failure.
>
> I think that's for the case where the modules is built on an OS that supports
> TCP_USER_TIMEOUT (#ifdef TCP_USER_TIMEOUT is true), and the module is used
> on an older OS that doesn't support TCP_USER_TIMEOUT. I remember I was
> sometimes able to do such a thing on Linux and Solaris. If we don't have
> to handle such usage, I agree about removing the special handling of
> ENOTPROTO.
Oops, I agree that we return an error even in the ENOPROTOOPT case, because setsockopt() is called only when the user
specifiestcp_user_timeout.
Regards
Takayuki Tsunakawa
