RE: Timeout parameters - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tsunakawa, Takayuki
Subject RE: Timeout parameters
Date
Msg-id 0A3221C70F24FB45833433255569204D1FBDBBD7@G01JPEXMBYT05
Whole thread Raw
In response to RE: Timeout parameters  (MikalaiKeida@ibagroup.eu)
List pgsql-hackers
From: MikalaiKeida@ibagroup.eu [mailto:MikalaiKeida@ibagroup.eu]
> Based on your comment it seems to me that 'socket_timeout' should be
> connected with statement_timeout. I mean that end-user should wait
> statement_timeout + 'socket_timeout' for returning control. It looks much
> more safer for me.

I'm afraid we cannot enforce that relationship programmatically, so I think the documentation should warn that
socket_timeoutbe longer than statement_timeout.
 


Regards
Takayuki Tsunakawa






pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Chapman Flack
Date:
Subject: Determine if FOR UPDATE or FOR SHARE was used?
Next
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: Making all nbtree entries unique by having heap TIDs participatein comparisons