RE: How can we submit code patches that implement our (pending)patents? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tsunakawa, Takayuki
Subject RE: How can we submit code patches that implement our (pending)patents?
Date
Msg-id 0A3221C70F24FB45833433255569204D1FA4C6DD@G01JPEXMBYT05
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: How can we submit code patches that implement our (pending) patents?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: How can we submit code patches that implement our (pending)patents?  (Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us]
> The core team has considered this matter, and has concluded that it's
> time to establish a firm project policy that we will not accept any code
> that is known to be patent-encumbered.  The long-term legal risks and
> complications involved in doing that seem insurmountable, given the
> community's amorphous legal nature and the existing Postgres license
> wording (neither of which are open for negotiation here).  Furthermore,
> Postgres has always been very friendly to creation of closed-source
> derivatives, but it's hard to see how inclusion of patented code would
> not cause serious problems for those.  The potential benefits of
> accepting patented code just don't seem to justify trying to navigate
> these hazards.

That decision is very unfortunate as a corporate employee on one hand, but the firm cleanness looks a bit bright to me
asone developer.
 

As a practical matter, when and where are you planning to post the project policy?  How would you check and prevent
patentedcode?
 


Regards
Takayuki Tsunakawa






pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Langote
Date:
Subject: Re: no partition pruning when partitioning using array type
Next
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: Excessive PostmasterIsAlive calls slow down WAL redo