From: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org
> [mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Peter Eisentraut
> > Personally, I prefer "wal writer", "wal sender" and "wal receiver"
> > that separate words as other process names. But I don't mind leaving
> > them as they are now.
>
> If we were to change those, that would break existing queries for
> pg_stat_activity. That's new in PG10, so we could change it if we were
> really eager. But it's probably not worth bothering. Then again, there
> is pg_stat_wal_receiver. So it's all totally inconsistent. Not sure
> where to go.
OK, I'm comfortable with as it is now.
I made this ready for committer. You can fix the following and commit the patch. Thank you.
> > * To achieve that, we pass "wal sender process" as username and
> > username
>
> good catch
Regards
Takayuki Tsunakawa
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
