Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [HACKERS] Is ECPG's SET CONNECTION really not thread-aware? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tsunakawa, Takayuki
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Is ECPG's SET CONNECTION really not thread-aware?
Date
Msg-id 0A3221C70F24FB45833433255569204D1F720716@G01JPEXMBYT05
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Is ECPG's SET CONNECTION really not thread-aware?  (Michael Meskes <meskes@postgresql.org>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Is ECPG's SET CONNECTION really not thread-aware?  (Michael Meskes <meskes@postgresql.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
From: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org
> [mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Michael Meskes
> I'm pretty sure it is indeed thread-aware, although I didn't provide the
> code for this feature myself.
> 
> > So the doc seems to need fix.  The patch is attached.
> 
> Thanks, applied.

Thank you, I'm relieved.

Could you also apply it to past versions if you don't mind?  The oldest supported version 9.2 is already thread-aware.

Regards
Takayuki Tsunakawa

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Fix tab-completion of ALTER SUBSCRIPTION SETPUBLICATION
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Parallel Aggregation support for aggregate functionsthat use transitions not implemented for array_agg