Re: Potential data loss of 2PC files - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tsunakawa, Takayuki
Subject Re: Potential data loss of 2PC files
Date
Msg-id 0A3221C70F24FB45833433255569204D1F6BC00B@G01JPEXMBYT05
Whole thread Raw
In response to [HACKERS] Potential data loss of 2PC files  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Potential data loss of 2PC files
List pgsql-hackers
From: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org
> [mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Michael Paquier
> Do you think that this qualifies as a bug fix for a backpatch? I would think
> so, but I would not mind waiting for some dust to be on it before considering
> applying that on back-branches. Thoughts from others?

I think so, too.  As change from rename() to durable_rename() was applied to all releases, maybe we can follow that.
Inaddition, keeping code differences as few as possible would make it easier for committers to apply other bug fixes to
allversions.
 

Regards
Takayuki Tsunakawa



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Potential data loss of 2PC files
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use $ parameters as replacement characters for pg_stat_statements