From: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org
> [mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Magnus HaganderOkay and I think partially it might be
becausewe don't have
> writeback
> optimization (done in 9.6) for Windows. However, still the broader
> question stands that whether above data is sufficient to say that
> we
> can recommend the settings of shared_buffers on Windows similar
> to
> Linux?
>
>
>
>
> Based on this optimization we might want to keep the text that says large
> shared buffers on Windows aren't as effective perhaps, and just remove the
> sentence that explicitly says don't go over 512MB?
Just removing the reference to the size would make users ask a question "What size is the effective upper limit?"
Regards
Takayuki Tsunakawa
