Re: [RFC] Should we fix postmaster to avoid slow shutdown? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tsunakawa, Takayuki
Subject Re: [RFC] Should we fix postmaster to avoid slow shutdown?
Date
Msg-id 0A3221C70F24FB45833433255569204D1F5F7700@G01JPEXMBYT05
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [RFC] Should we fix postmaster to avoid slow shutdown?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [RFC] Should we fix postmaster to avoid slow shutdown?
Re: [RFC] Should we fix postmaster to avoid slow shutdown?
List pgsql-hackers
From: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org
> [mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Tom Lane
FWIW, I'm pretty much -1 on messing with the timing of the socket close
> actions.  I broke that once within recent memory, so maybe I'm gun-shy,
> but I think that the odds of unpleasant side effects greatly outweigh any
> likely benefit there.

I couldn't find any relevant mails in pgsql-hackers.  I found no problem with the attached patch.  Do you think this is
OK?

Regards
Takayuki Tsunakawa



Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Gavin Flower
Date:
Subject: Re: multivariate statistics (v19)
Next
From: Dean Rasheed
Date:
Subject: Re: multivariate statistics (v19)