Re: [GENERAL] Strange port in pg_upgrade output - Mailing list pgsql-general

From armand pirvu
Subject Re: [GENERAL] Strange port in pg_upgrade output
Date
Msg-id 0A11E9ED-7E6C-4067-AB13-398C435362AB@gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [GENERAL] Strange port in pg_upgrade output  (Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>)
List pgsql-general
Got it



Thank you

On Jun 12, 2017, at 4:16 PM, Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com> wrote:

On 06/12/2017 02:07 PM, armand pirvu wrote:
Hi
I was doing a test upgrade from 9.5 to 9.6 and the following lines caught my eye
postgres 10967 10911  0 15:59 pts/0    00:00:00 /usr/pgsql-9.6/bin/pg_upgrade -d /var/lib/pgsql/9.5/data -D /var/lib/pgsql/9.6/data -b /usr/pgsql-9.5/bin -B /usr/pgsql-9.6/bin -k -v
postgres 11141     1  0 16:00 pts/0    00:00:00 /usr/pgsql-9.6/bin/postgres -D /var/lib/pgsql/9.6/data -p 50432 -b -c synchronous_commit=off -c fsync=off -c full_page_writes=off -c listen_addresses= -c unix_socket_permissions=0700 -c unix_so
postgres 11160 10967  0 16:00 pts/0    00:00:00 sh -c "/usr/pgsql-9.6/bin/pg_restore" --host '/var/lib/pgsql' --port 50432 --username 'postgres' --exit-on-error --verbose --dbname 'dbname=birstdb' "pg_upgrade_dump_25288.custom" >> "pg_upgrad
postgres 11161 11160  6 16:00 pts/0    00:00:00 /usr/pgsql-9.6/bin/pg_restore --host /var/lib/pgsql --port 50432 --username postgres --exit-on-error --verbose --dbname dbname=birstdb pg_upgrade_dump_25288.custom
sudo grep -i port /var/lib/pgsql/9.6/data/postgresql.conf
[sudo] password for armandp:
port = 5432 # (change requires restart)
# supported by the operating system:
Is it something that I missed or is it intentionally using a non default port to avoid unintended client connections ?

https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.6/static/pgupgrade.html

"Obviously, no one should be accessing the clusters during the upgrade. pg_upgrade defaults to running servers on port 50432 to avoid unintended client connections. You can use the same port number for both clusters when doing an upgrade because the old and new clusters will not be running at the same time. However, when checking an old running server, the old and new port numbers must be different."

Thanks
Armand


-- 
Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@aklaver.com

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Adrian Klaver
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Strange port in pg_upgrade output
Next
From: Justin Pryzby
Date:
Subject: [GENERAL] workaround for column cross-correlation