Re: [HACKERS] increasing the default WAL segment size - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: [HACKERS] increasing the default WAL segment size
Date
Msg-id 09bfbe97-a51b-246e-2e0d-a7d6e50d8c4b@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] increasing the default WAL segment size  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] increasing the default WAL segment size  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 3/16/17 21:10, Robert Haas wrote:
> The changes to pg_standby seem to completely break the logic to wait
> until the file has attained the correct size.  I don't know how to
> salvage that logic off-hand, but just breaking it isn't acceptable.

I think we would have to extend restore_command with an additional
placeholder that communicates the segment size, and add a new pg_standby
option to accept that size somehow.  And specifying the size would have
to be mandatory, for complete robustness.  Urgh.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Kevin Grittner
Date:
Subject: [HACKERS] Candidate for local inline function?
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Candidate for local inline function?