On 21.03.23 18:46, Andres Freund wrote:
> FWIW, I think we should consider getting rid of attcacheoff. I doubt it's
> worth its weight these days, because deforming via slots starts at the
> beginning anyway. The overhead of maintaining it is not insubstantial, and
> it's just architecturally ugly to to update tupledescs continually.
Btw., could attcacheoff be int16?
