RE: "Cluster" means "tangle" for me - Mailing list pgsql-general
From | Jeff Eckermann |
---|---|
Subject | RE: "Cluster" means "tangle" for me |
Date | |
Msg-id | 08CD1781F85AD4118E0800A0C9B8580B09488F@NEZU Whole thread Raw |
In response to | "Cluster" means "tangle" for me (Jeff Eckermann <jeckermann@verio.net>) |
Responses |
Re: "Cluster" means "tangle" for me
|
List | pgsql-general |
Thanks for the advice. I repeated the vacuum, but it completed without any mdopen notices this time. I created files corresponding to the temp* names from the last vacuum, but was still unable to drop the table. After confirming that there was no reference to the table name in any of the system tables, I deleted the "dedcolo" file from the database directory. Now I was able to create a table with that name. I couldn't resist going back for a second try, using a similarly named table with the same data (neither this nor the previous was a temp table, BTW): extracts=# create table dedcolo (test text); CREATE extracts=# drop table dedcolo; DROP extracts=# \d dedcolo2 Table "dedcolo2" Attribute | Type | Modifier --------------------------+---------+---------- market_code | text | legacy_acct_no | text | usage_guiding | text | service_identifier | text | subscriber_no | integer | rev_rcv_cost_center | text | arbor_acct_no | integer | last_name | text | first_name | text | company_name | text | sales_code | text | date_created | date | tracking_id | integer | product_start_date | date | product_stop_date | date | product_status | text | prod_billed_thru_date | date | element_id | text | equip_type | text | product_description | text | billing_frequency | text | rate | money | rate_override_start_date | date | rate_override_end_date | date | rate_override | money | disconnect_reason | text | Indices: dc2_acct_i, dc2_et_i extracts=# cluster dc2_acct_i on dedcolo2; ERROR: temp_28a1899 is an index relation extracts=# \d dedcolo Did not find any relation named "dedcolo". extracts=# \d temp_28a1899 Index "temp_28a1899" Attribute | Type ---------------+--------- arbor_acct_no | integer btree extracts=# This corresponds to the index being clustered. > -----Original Message----- > From: Tom Lane [SMTP:tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us] > Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2001 6:57 PM > To: Jeff Eckermann > Cc: 'pgsql-general@postgresql.org' > Subject: Re: [GENERAL] "Cluster" means "tangle" for me > > Jeff Eckermann <jeckermann@verio.net> writes: > > I would appreciate any advice on getting out of this strange situation. > My > > table now doesn't exist, but I can't recreate it either (at least under > that > > name). > > Hmm, was "dedcolo" a temp table? It looks like clustering a temp table > gets confused. (In current sources, it's still pretty broken: the > cluster succeeds, but the table is no longer temp afterwards ... > will try to fix this for 7.1.) > > I'd suggest that you restart your session, then repeat the vacuum, > and for each table that you get "mdopen" notices about, create an > empty file by that name in the database directory. Then you'll be > able to drop that table. > > regards, tom lane
pgsql-general by date: