Re: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade --link on Windows - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Arnaud L.
Subject Re: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade --link on Windows
Date
Msg-id 07b4526e-1bff-654c-4cc0-9dd6b72e0ca8@codata.eu
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade --link on Windows  ("Arnaud L." <arnaud.listes@codata.eu>)
List pgsql-general
Le 9/06/2017 à 17:02, Arnaud L. a écrit :
> Le 9/06/2017 à 16:55, Adrian Klaver a écrit :
>> On 06/09/2017 07:39 AM, Arnaud L. wrote:
>>> So maybe pg_upgrade uses hard-links (i.e. to files), and only the
>>> documentation is wrong by calling them junctions (i.e. soft links to
>>> files) ?
>>
>> Looks that way. In file.c in ~/src/bin/pg_upgrade I see:
>>
>> #ifdef WIN32
>>    300 /* implementation of pg_link_file() on Windows */
>>    301 static int
>>    302 win32_pghardlink(const char *src, const char *dst)
>>    303 {
>>    304     /*
>>    305      * CreateHardLinkA returns zero for failure
>>    306      * http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa363860(VS.85).aspx
>>    307      */
>>    308     if (CreateHardLinkA(dst, src, NULL) == 0)
>>    309     {
>>    310         _dosmaperr(GetLastError());
>>    311         return -1;
>>    312     }
>>    313     else
>>    314         return 0;
>>    315 }
>>    316 #endif
>
> Great !
> So I did a full upgrade for nothing (just for safety), but that's good
> to know for next time !
> Should this be submitted to postgresql-bugs, or is there something more
> specific to the documentation ?

I just found the pgsql-docs@postgresql.org list, for for the spam.

--
Arnaud



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Arnaud L."
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade --link on Windows
Next
From: armand pirvu
Date:
Subject: [GENERAL] Vacuum and state_change