On Jan 4, 2010, at 12:30 PM, Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote:
> well exactly my point - that is what I think we really need and basing it upon a service we directly control is
certainlyeasier than doing (useful) aggregation of only external services. That said we probably need both :)
Yes, because whether or not pgFoundry sticks around, lots of folks will use other stuff.
> why centralize again? if we are advocating external resources why would we bother with maintaining an even more
complexmailinglist setup?
It's already centralized on pgFoundry. What's the difference?
>> The latter. Which most other project hosting sites already offer.
>
> ok but still you would have to aggregate all the stuff on those wikis back into the (hypothetical)
aggregation/umbrellaservice ;)
No, you don't need an aggregation of Web sites. Just stuff like news or releases.
Best,
David
