Re: WIP: About CMake v2 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Yury Zhuravlev
Subject Re: WIP: About CMake v2
Date
Msg-id 06eb7b98-3d54-4cd1-8793-1e94a1510cd3@postgrespro.ru
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: WIP: About CMake v2  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> So this is really not open for negotiation.  As Peter said upthread,
> what we are looking for in a CMake reimplementation is that it behaves
> exactly like the Autoconf version does.  To the extent that you are unable
> or unwilling to duplicate that behavior, you increase the odds that
> we'll reject this work.
Who asking about negotiation? I just wanted an explanation for the clear
understanding and nothing more.
Now I know about reasons. Thanks.

regards
--
Yury Zhuravlev
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
Date:
Subject: Re: Radix tree for character conversion
Next
From: Fabien COELHO
Date:
Subject: Re: pgbench - allow backslash continuations in \set expressions