On 11/05/17 09:27, Noah Misch wrote:
> On Mon, May 08, 2017 at 05:01:00PM -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> On 5/7/17 04:21, Noah Misch wrote:
>>> The above-described topic is currently a PostgreSQL 10 open item. Peter,
>>> since you committed the patch believed to have created it, you own this open
>>> item. If some other commit is more relevant or if this does not belong as a
>>> v10 open item, please let us know. Otherwise, please observe the policy on
>>> open item ownership[1] and send a status update within three calendar days of
>>> this message. Include a date for your subsequent status update. Testers may
>>> discover new open items at any time, and I want to plan to get them all fixed
>>> well in advance of shipping v10. Consequently, I will appreciate your efforts
>>> toward speedy resolution. Thanks.
>>
>> I think we have a workable patch, but it needs some rebasing. I hope to
>> have this sorted by Wednesday.
>
> This PostgreSQL 10 open item is past due for your status update. Kindly send
> a status update within 24 hours, and include a date for your subsequent status
> update. Refer to the policy on open item ownership:
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20170404140717.GA2675809%40tornado.leadboat.com
>
The patch Peter mentioned was committed.
There is however another open item associated with this thread for which
there is another patch as well.
-- Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training &
Services
