Re: Document use of ldapurl with LDAP simple bind - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Document use of ldapurl with LDAP simple bind
Date
Msg-id 06b44ab0-8079-4f03-8d67-e7d2c9a9dad9@eisentraut.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Document use of ldapurl with LDAP simple bind  (Jacob Champion <jacob.champion@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: Document use of ldapurl with LDAP simple bind
List pgsql-hackers
On 08.07.24 23:27, Jacob Champion wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 28, 2024 at 12:11 AM Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org> wrote:
>> This appears to imply that specifying ldapurl is only applicable for
>> search+bind.  Maybe that whole message should be simplified to something
>> like
>>
>> "configuration mixes arguments for simple bind and search+bind"
>>
>> (The old wording also ignores that the error might arise via "ldapsuffix".)
> 
> I kept the imperative "cannot" and tried to match the terminology with
> our documentation at [1]:
> 
>      cannot mix options for simple bind and search+bind modes

Committed.

(I suppose this could be considered a bug fix, but I don't feel an 
urgency to go backpatching this.  Let me know if there are different 
opinions.)




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Richard Guo
Date:
Subject: Re: Reuse child_relids in try_partitionwise_join was Re: Assert failure on bms_equal(child_joinrel->relids, child_joinrelids)
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: XID formatting and SLRU refactorings (was: Add 64-bit XIDs into PostgreSQL 15)