On 11/19/24 18:12, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 19, 2024 at 12:30 PM Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com> wrote:
>> Any other opinions out there?
>
> Why should we accept your patch (which adds a legacy_crypto_enabled
> GUC) instead of adopting the approach originally proposed (i.e. use
> the OpenSSL version of the functions)?
Because that idea was rejected earlier in the thread by multiple people
other than me?
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
--
Joe Conway
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com