Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: pgtune + configurations with 9.3 - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Shaun Thomas
Subject Re: pgtune + configurations with 9.3
Date
Msg-id 0683F5F5A5C7FE419A752A034B4A0B9797DA19EC@sswchi5pmbx2.peak6.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pgtune + configurations with 9.3  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
Responses Re[2]: [PERFORM] pgtune + configurations with 9.3  (Alexey Vasiliev <leopard_ne@inbox.ru>)
List pgsql-performance
Tree view 
> Yeah, pgTune is pretty badly out of date.  It's been on my TODO list, as
> I'm sure it has been on Greg's.

Yeah. And unfortunately the recommendations it gives have been spreading. Take a look at the online version:

http://pgtune.leopard.in.ua/

I entered a pretty typical 92GB system, and it recommended 23GB of shared buffers. I tried to tell the author the
performanceguidelines have since changed, but it didn't help. 


______________________________________________

See http://www.peak6.com/email_disclaimer/ for terms and conditions related to this email

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: Postgres does not use indexes with OR-conditions
Next
From: Kevin Grittner
Date:
Subject: Re: Postgres does not use indexes with OR-conditions