On 2020/06/18 3:04, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> I think passing the slot name when the slot is also passed is useless
> and wasteful; it'd be better to pass NULL for the name and ignore the
> strcmp() in that case -- in fact I suggest to forbid passing both name
> and slot. (Any failure there would risk raising an error during
> checkpoint, which is undesirable.)
Sounds reasonable.
> So I propose the following tweaks to your patch, and otherwise +1.
Thanks for the patch! It looks good to me.
Barring any objections, I will commit the patches in the master and
v13 branches later.
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION
