Re: MultiXactMemberControlLock contention on a replica - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Christophe Pettus
Subject Re: MultiXactMemberControlLock contention on a replica
Date
Msg-id 061BEE02-EA45-4ED5-A9CB-2015D133CA2B@thebuild.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: MultiXactMemberControlLock contention on a replica  (Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>)
Responses Re: MultiXactMemberControlLock contention on a replica  (Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>)
List pgsql-general

> On Feb 15, 2021, at 07:47, Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at> wrote:
> So my guess would be that the difference between primary and standby is not that a
> different number of multixacts are created, but that you need to read them on
> the standby and not on the primary.

Why does the secondary need to read them?  Visibility?
--
-- Christophe Pettus
   xof@thebuild.com




pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Laurenz Albe
Date:
Subject: Re: MultiXactMemberControlLock contention on a replica
Next
From: Ron
Date:
Subject: ADD FOREIGN KEY fails, but the records exist