On 10/25/16 11:26 AM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Per: https://www.commandprompt.com/blog/can_i_make_initdb_quiet/
>
> This was a question that was asked on #postgresql. Obviously we found a
> work around but I wonder if it makes sense to add a -q to solve some of
> these issues? (I could see it being useful with automation).
Well, there's always pg_ctl initdb -s (not sure why it's -s instead of
the more common -q...). ISTM it'd be better to point people that
direction, but a silent option to initdb certainly wouldn't hurt (and
would maybe simplify pg_ctl as well...)
--
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX
Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com
855-TREBLE2 (855-873-2532) mobile: 512-569-9461
