Re: [HACKERS] [POC] hash partitioning - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: [HACKERS] [POC] hash partitioning
Date
Msg-id 056dad67-0eb7-cda9-ca4f-cec0a3860806@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] [POC] hash partitioning  (Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] [POC] hash partitioning  (Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 5/15/17 23:45, Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
> +1. We should throw an error and add a line in documentation that
> collation should not be specified for hash partitioned table.

Why is it even allowed in the parser then?

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: tushar
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Server Crashes if try to provide slot_name='none' atthe time of creating subscription.
Next
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] bumping HASH_VERSION to 3