Re: Doc of typmod arg perhaps deserves an update - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Steve Lau
Subject Re: Doc of typmod arg perhaps deserves an update
Date
Msg-id 055FCAEC-228C-4C48-9797-56991DB0017B@outlook.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Doc of typmod arg perhaps deserves an update  (Chapman Flack <jcflack@acm.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hi

Did you post the wrong link? This one looks same as the one I mentioned. Though I realized that you have replied to
thisthread: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/56EA3507.6090701%40anastigmatix.net
 

Regards, Steve.

> On Oct 11, 2024, at 8:42 PM, Chapman Flack <jcflack@acm.org> wrote:
> 
> On 10/11/24 01:33, Steve Lau wrote:
>> Before hitting the issue, I thought -1 will be passed if and only if
>> this type does not have type modifiers, as it is indeed unknown. However,
>> it surprises me that it could also be unknown if your type needs
>> type modifiers and the type modifiers have been successfully stored
> 
> This older thread may be of interest:
> 
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/162867790903161317q178e11e6ie276d1254c279dd1%40mail.gmail.com
> 
> Regards,
> -Chap


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: sunsetting md5 password support
Next
From: Nathan Bossart
Date:
Subject: Re: Function for listing pg_wal/summaries directory