On 9/22/21 20:11, Amit Kapila wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 3:06 AM Jeremy Schneider <schnjere@amazon.com> wrote: >> >> Any chance of back-patching this? > > Normally, we don't back-patch code improvements unless they fix some > bug or avoid future back-patch efforts. So, I am not inclined to > back-patch this but if others also feel strongly about this then we > can consider it. The original thread about the logical replication bugs spawned a few different threads and code changes. The other code changes coming out of those threads were all back-patched, but I guess I can see arguments both ways on this one. https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/E1i74JE-00024V-9J%40gemulon.postgresql.org https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commit;h=29b5905470285bf730f6fe7cc5ddb3513d0e6945 https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commit;h=df3640e5293dccbf964508babfc067282ea7a2fc -- Jeremy Schneider Database Engineer Amazon Web Services
pgsql-hackers by date:
Соглашаюсь с условиями обработки персональных данных