Re: Optimize expresiions. - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Adam Rich
Subject Re: Optimize expresiions.
Date
Msg-id 044701c73589$50e7aae0$6400a8c0@dualcore
Whole thread Raw
In response to Optimize expresiions.  (han.holl@informationslogik.nl)
Responses Re: Optimize expresiions.
List pgsql-general
How about this?

select item, very_expensive_function(item) as exp, cheap
from ( Select item, cheap_function(item) as cheap
    From atable where cheap_function(item) > 0 ) sub
where very_expensive_function(item) > 0





-----Original Message-----
From: pgsql-general-owner@postgresql.org
[mailto:pgsql-general-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of
han.holl@informationslogik.nl
Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2007 4:59 AM
To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: [GENERAL] Optimize expresiions.



Hello,

Given a table:
create table atable (
  item integer;
);
and a view:
create view aview as select
  item,
  very_expensive_function(item) as exp,
  cheap_function(item) as cheap
from atable;

Now the query:
select item from aview where exp > 0 and cheap > 0;
will lead to a sequential scan on atable with filter:
very_expensive_function(item) > 0 and cheap_function(item) > 0

The query would run much faster with the filter reordered.
Is there a way to tell the planner/optimizer that certain functions are
more
expensive than others, and should be postponed in lazy evaluation ?
Or is there a hook in the system that would allow me too look at and
maybe
reorder expressions before they are executed ?

Cheers,

Han Holl


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

               http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Martijn van Oosterhout
Date:
Subject: Re: Knowing the length(convert(username using windows_1251_to_utf8))
Next
From: Martijn van Oosterhout
Date:
Subject: Re: TRIGGER BEFORE INSERT