Re: contrib vs. gborg/pgfoundry for replication solutions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dave Page
Subject Re: contrib vs. gborg/pgfoundry for replication solutions
Date
Msg-id 03AF4E498C591348A42FC93DEA9661B889FAF7@mail.vale-housing.co.uk
Whole thread Raw
In response to contrib vs. gborg/pgfoundry for replication solutions  (Jan Wieck <JanWieck@Yahoo.com>)
List pgsql-hackers

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joshua D. Drake [mailto:jd@commandprompt.com]
> Sent: 21 April 2004 19:16
> To: Jan Wieck
> Cc: PostgreSQL-development
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] contrib vs. gborg/pgfoundry for
> replication solutions
>
> Hello,
>
> My personal opinion is that contrib should be removed
> entirely. Just have a contrib.txt that says all contrib
> modules are at pgfoundry or whatever.

Couldn't agree more.

Regards, Dave.


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: contrib vs. gborg/pgfoundry for replication solutions
Next
From: "Marc G. Fournier"
Date:
Subject: Re: contrib vs. gborg/pgfoundry for replication solutions