Re: The Name Game: postgresql.net vs. pgfoundry.org - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dave Page
Subject Re: The Name Game: postgresql.net vs. pgfoundry.org
Date
Msg-id 03AF4E498C591348A42FC93DEA9661B889F68E@mail.vale-housing.co.uk
Whole thread Raw
In response to The Name Game: postgresql.net vs. pgfoundry.org  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
Responses Re: The Name Game: postgresql.net vs. pgfoundry.org  ("Jeroen T. Vermeulen" <jtv@xs4all.nl>)
Re: The Name Game: postgresql.net vs. pgfoundry.org  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
List pgsql-hackers

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andreas Pflug [mailto:pgadmin@pse-consulting.de]
> Sent: 12 March 2004 13:57
> To: josh@agliodbs.com
> Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] The Name Game: postgresql.net vs. pgfoundry.org
>
>
> Isn't gforge a pgsql related project itself?
> So I'd suggest:
>
> www.postgresql.org   -> main PostgreSQL site
> gforge.postgresql.org -> gforge interface site
> <projectname>.postgresql.org -> gforge hosted projects

The problem with that approach is that our 'official' sites then get
lost amongst the project sites.

We need some distinction between the core project sites and other
project sites - istm that a different domain is the only way to do that.

Regards, Dave.


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: client side syntax error localisation for psql (v1)
Next
From: Fabien COELHO
Date:
Subject: Re: client side syntax error localisation for psql (v1)