> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us]
> Sent: 29 September 2003 15:23
> To: Peter Eisentraut
> Cc: Dave Page; Alvaro Herrera; Hackers
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] more i18n/l10n issues
>
>
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> > Dave Page writes:
> >> I find this a little worrying because if we want a feature
> or tweak
> >> for pgAdmin we usually have to fight tooth & nail to
> justify getting
> >> it committed (which is not a bad thing), however 'some guys at Red
> >> Hat' are getting switches added to the postmaster without any
> >> discussion?
>
> > It was not a nice thing to do.
>
> Gimme a break, guys. There *was* discussion, eg here,
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2003-06/msg01092.php
> and the patch was posted for review, see this thread:
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2003-06/msg00420.php
My apologes - I was basing my comments on someone else's assertion that
there was no discussion.
Regards, Dave.
