Re: PostgreSQL 7.3/RH 9/PGAdmin Not a good combo? - Mailing list pgadmin-support

From Dave Page
Subject Re: PostgreSQL 7.3/RH 9/PGAdmin Not a good combo?
Date
Msg-id 03AF4E498C591348A42FC93DEA9661B8259EF5@mail.vale-housing.co.uk
Whole thread Raw
In response to PostgreSQL 7.3/RH 9/PGAdmin Not a good combo?  (Jim Hines <jhines@wdtv.com>)
Responses Re: PostgreSQL 7.3/RH 9/PGAdmin Not a good combo?  (Jim Hines <jhines@wdtv.com>)
List pgadmin-support

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jim Hines [mailto:jhines@wdtv.com]
> Sent: 03 April 2003 20:05
> To: Dave Page; pgadmin-support@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [pgadmin-support] PostgreSQL 7.3/RH 9/PGAdmin
> Not a good combo?
>
>
> On Thursday 03 April 2003 01:47 pm, Dave Page wrote:
> > Hi Jim,
> >
> > This is a bug caused by a very long string in the RedHat build of
> > PostgreSQL that overflows a buff in the ODBC driver.
> >
> > Please try the snapshot driver from
> > http://www.geocities.jp/inocchichichi/psqlodbc/
>
> If I would remove the Redhat build and put in the RPMs from
> the Postgresql.org
> site, would that fix this issue as well?

Depends if they were built on Redhat 9 because the error comes from the
long gcc version string that PostgreSQL includes in it's version string.

Regards, Dave.


pgadmin-support by date:

Previous
From: Jim Hines
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL 7.3/RH 9/PGAdmin Not a good combo?
Next
From: Jim Hines
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL 7.3/RH 9/PGAdmin Not a good combo?