On 10/26/20 10:53 PM, Hu Bert wrote:
> Hi Adrian,
>
> thx for your answer. I checked all the relevant & installed packages:
>
> hi postgis 3.0.2+dfsg-2.pgdg100+1
> ii postgis-doc 3.0.2+dfsg-2.pgdg100+1
> ii postgresql-12 12.4-1.pgdg100+1
> ii postgresql-12-postgis-2.5 2.5.5+dfsg-1.pgdg100+1
> ii postgresql-12-postgis-2.5-scripts 2.5.5+dfsg-1.pgdg100+1
> ii postgresql-12-postgis-3 3.0.2+dfsg-2.pgdg100+1
> ii postgresql-12-postgis-3-scripts 3.0.2+dfsg-2.pgdg100+1
> ii postgresql-client-12 12.4-1.pgdg100+1
> ii postgresql-client-common 217.pgdg100+1
> ii postgresql-common 217.pgdg100+1
>
> None of these 3 meta packages is installed. So i wonder why
> postgresql-13 will be installed though. I have another server with
> postgresql installed; packages there:
>
> ii postgresql-12 12.4-1.pgdg100+1
> ii postgresql-12-postgis-2.5 2.5.5+dfsg-1.pgdg100+1
> ii postgresql-12-postgis-2.5-scripts 2.5.5+dfsg-1.pgdg100+1
> ii postgresql-client-12 12.4-1.pgdg100+1
> ii postgresql-client-common 216.pgdg100+1
> ii postgresql-common 216.pgdg100+1
>
> Debian buster as well, same packages. Difference: only postgis &
> postgresql-12-postgis-3 & postgresql-12-postgis-3-scripts packages are
> missing, but with 'apt update && apt upgrade' no postgresql-13 will be
> installed.
>
> For the moment i set the postgis package on hold, and the effect is:
> no postgresql-13 update/upgrade. Strange.
Yeah it seems:
postgis/buster-pgdg 3.0.2+dfsg-4.pgdg100+1 amd64 [upgradable from:
3.0.2+dfsg-2.pgdg100+1]
has introduced a dependency on Postgres 13.
That is something the packagers would need to answer. You can try at
Contact here:
https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Apt#Contact
Or by filing an issue here:
https://redmine.postgresql.org/projects/pgapt/issues
FYI, for the above you will need a community account.
>
>
> Best regards,
> Hubert
>
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@aklaver.com
