it turns out there is http://developer.postgresql.org/todo.php
yeahh , most of online info I was looking for
...were not accessible in time of writing previous messages.
----- Original Message -----
From: <alvis@piladzi-2.biz>
To: <pgsql-general@postgresql.org>
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 3:59 PM
Subject: Re: relation model vs SQL1999 conformance vs PostgreSQL
> hello me,
> Since I am able to search archives (plus reading your docs), I have found
> answers to almost all of my questions.
> albeit attempt to invoke spirits failed.
> Looks like I rised too much general questions, indecent for
> pgsql-general@postgresql.org list ;-).
>
> anyway Postgres documentation is great!
>
> Regards,
> Alvis
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <alvis@piladzi-2.biz>
> To: <pgsql-general@postgresql.org>
> Sent: Sunday, June 08, 2003 6:06 AM
> Subject: relation model vs SQL1999 conformance vs PostgreSQL
>
>
> > hello all,
> >
> > In general my question to all PostgreSQL community is stated in the
> subject
> > line.
> > Looks like I am missing something 'cause I am new to this list, but I
> don't
> > see much info
> > on this subject in your web page.
> > Perhaps the only information I have found is in v.7.4 dev. documents
about
> > SQL1999 conformace.
> > How much from SQL1999 are you going to implement?
> > (I mean in the long run, say any plans for next 3 years, kind of TODO
> > lists?)
> > As far as I see there are features (i.e. kind of array support) in
> > PostgreSQL that are implemented looong before SQL99.
> > Do you feel you have to conform to SQL99 for marketing considerations?
or
> > else?
> > I don't know nothing about any conformance tests for SQL99, kind of
> strange?
> >
> > In particular I am interested how do you feel about REF type (or using
> > pointers) to join tables.
> > Any pointers to additional information on the subject will be highly
> > appreciated.
> > Hope it is right list for these questions.
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> > Alvis Tunkelis
> >
>
