Dave Page wrote:
>
> You have pg_database_size(oid) and database_size(name). Afaict, the
> latter is equivalent to:
>
> SELECT pg_database_size((SELECT oid FROM pg_database WHERE datname =
> 'foo'))
The typing is even more e.g. for tables or indexes, though. Of course you
can use the raw form, but why do we have pg_tables if there is pg_class
anyway.
> My main concern is that the names are inconsistent for no obvious
> reason.
That could be fixed by having:
pg_database_size(name)
pg_database_size(oid)
The original idea was probably to name "internal" functions with pg_ and
more user friendly ones without pg_. That does not mean it's a good idea.
> I also questioned whether or not the bloat of an additional
> function is worthwhile for what is probably a very small number of psql
> users that might use it (probably quite rarely), however if people say
> they would use it and that it's wothwhile, I wouldn't argue with it's
> inclusion.
Well, I don't feel this is really bloat. I have been using them since the
creation of the contrib module and have found them quite useful.
Best Regards,
Michael Paesold
