On 11/29/18 10:48 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Thanks! I pushed this with two changes -- one was to reword the docs a
> bit more, and the other was to compute in_sample only if it's going to
> be used (when exceeded is true). I hope this won't upset any compilers ...
Thanks!
>
> I wonder if there's any sensible way to verify the behavior in an
> automated fashion. Who know what marvels we'd discover about the
> reliability/uniformity of random() across platforms.
>
Yes, I also wondered how to add tests.
