Meskes-san
Thank you for your comment.
I remove it and attach a new patch. Please review it.
I feel sorry for asking you to reveiw without contribution.
Regards
Ryo Matsumura
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Meskes [mailto:meskes@postgresql.org]
> Sent: Friday, February 1, 2019 6:29 PM
> To: Matsumura, Ryo/松村 量 <matsumura.ryo@jp.fujitsu.com>
> Cc: 'Michael Meskes' <meskes@postgresql.org>; Tsunakawa, Takayuki/綱川 貴
> 之 <tsunakawa.takay@jp.fujitsu.com>; pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL]a new data type 'bytea' for ECPG
>
> Matsumura-san,
>
> > Sorry to bother you, but I would be grateful if you would comment to me.
>
> Sorry, I didn't know you were waiting on a reply by me.
>
> > > I have a question about ecpg manual when I add article for bytea.
> > > I wonder what does the following about VARCHAR mean.
> > > ...
> > > I think, if the footnote of VARCHAR is meaningless, I remove it while I
> add
> > > the article for bytea. (I didn't remove in this patch.)
>
> I have no idea where the footnote comes from, but I agree that it doesn't seem
> to make sense. The datatype varchar in the C code is handled by the
> preprocessor and replaced by a struct definition anyway.
>
> Feel free to remove.
>
> Michael
> --
> Michael Meskes
> Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org)
> Meskes at (Debian|Postgresql) dot Org
> Jabber: michael at xmpp dot meskes dot org
> VfL Borussia! Força Barça! Go SF 49ers! Use Debian GNU/Linux, PostgreSQL
>
