> * What's the benefit of supporting UTF16 in host variables?
I think that the first benefit of suggestion is providing a way to
treat UTF16 chars for application. Whether or not to support above
U+FFFF (e.g. surrogate pair) may be a next discussion.
For that purpose, implementation for the suggestion may be easier
than for supporting UTF16 at client_encoding. Uvarchar seems to be
a label indicating that stored data is encoded by UTF16. It localizes
the impacts within only labeled host variable.
# At least, ecpglib is not good at treating 0x00 as a part of one character.
Regards
Ryo Matsumura
