Re: [HACKERS] Autovacuum loose ends - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Michael Paesold
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Autovacuum loose ends
Date
Msg-id 02b901c5950c$7f85d2b0$8802460a@zaphod
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Autovacuum loose ends  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Autovacuum loose ends  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-patches
Alvaro Herrera wrote:

> I still haven't added custom cost-based delays, but I don't see that as
> a showstopper for removing it.  I just went through the CVS log and I
> don't see anything else that applies.

I think you should at least add an autovacuum specific value for
"vacuum_cost_delay" because it turns cost-based vacuum delay on or off. I
believe not many will have vacuum_cost_delay enabled in postgresql.conf, but
will want to enable it for autovacuum.
At least I do.

Best Regards,
Michael Paesold


pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Omar Kilani
Date:
Subject: Re: INSERT ... RETURNING
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PL/Perl list value return causes segfault