Re: Used Memory - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Christian Paul B. Cosinas
Subject Re: Used Memory
Date
Msg-id 02b501c5d83c$d6bf0f10$1e21100a@ghwk02002147
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Used Memory  (Alex Turner <armtuk@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Used Memory
List pgsql-performance

 

total                  used                 free                   shared              buffers               cached

Mem:                6192460            6137424            55036               0                      85952               5828844

-/+ buffers/cache:                       222628              5969832

Swap:               2096472            0                      2096472

 

 

Here is the result of “free” command” I am talking about.

What does this result mean?

 

I just noticed that as long as the free memory in the first row (which is 55036 as of now) became low, the slower is the response of the database server.



I choose Polesoft Lockspam to fight spam, and you?
http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: "Karl O. Pinc"
Date:
Subject: Re: Using LIMIT 1 in plpgsql PERFORM statements
Next
From: Robert Edmonds
Date:
Subject: performance of implicit join vs. explicit conditions on inet queries?