Re: [GENERAL] archive_command fails but works outside of Postgres - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Mark Watson
Subject Re: [GENERAL] archive_command fails but works outside of Postgres
Date
Msg-id 02F1BBB48ABD3245A3BC519B57CFC8CA018C8FC2C8@Exchange.JurisConcept.local
Whole thread Raw
In response to [GENERAL] archive_command fails but works outside of Postgres  (twoflower <standa.kurik@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [GENERAL] archive_command fails but works outside of Postgres  (twoflower <standa.kurik@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general

De : pgsql-general-owner@postgresql.org [mailto:pgsql-general-owner@postgresql.org] De la part de twoflower
Envoyé : Friday, August 18, 2017 2:40 PM
À : pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Objet : [GENERAL] archive_command fails but works outside of Postgres

 

I changed my archive_command to the following:

 
archive_command = 'gsutil cp /storage/postgresql/9.6/main/%p gs://my_bucket/pg_xlog/'

and it fails, leaving the following in the log:

 
2017-08-18 18:34:25.057 GMT [1436][0]: [104319] LOG:  archive command failed with exit code 1
2017-08-18 18:34:25.057 GMT [1436][0]: [104320] DETAIL:  The failed archive command was: gsutil cp  /storage/postgresql/9.6/main/000000010000038B000000D8 gs://my_bucket/pg_xlog/
2017-08-18 18:34:25.057 GMT [1436][0]: [104321] WARNING:  archiving transaction log file "000000010000038B000000D8" failed too many times, will try again later


But the command works when executed manually:

 
root$ su postgres -c "gsutil cp /storage/postgresql/9.6/main/000000010000038B000000D8 gs://my_bucket/pg_xlog/"
root$ echo $?
0

The last command verifies that gsutil indeed exited with 0.

How to best debug this issue?

 

I think the parameter %p contains the complete path of the file and that you may need to specify the file name for the destination. Try this for your archive command :

archive_command = 'gsutil cp "%p" "gs://my_bucket/pg_xlog/%f"'        

 

-          Mark Watson

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] archive_command fails but works outside of Postgres
Next
From: Vincenzo Romano
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Results interpretation