> On 2 Jul 2025, at 06:31, Robert Treat <rob@xzilla.net> wrote:
> FWIW, I tend to agree with David; I feel like if a user passes in -U,
> there was probably a reason, and a good error message would be more
> useful in clarifying things rather than blindly pushing forward with
> potentially the wrong thing.
Agreed, and it's not even clear that the previous code was intentionally trying
to allow an empty -U. An improved error message would be a good patch though.
--
Daniel Gustafsson
