Hi Florian-san.
debugger operates very wonderful by EnterpriseDB now. However, some functions
for the operation still run short by the OSS-PostgreSQL version. Then, Korry-san
will realize it soon. And the specification is very great. The specification of debugger
contains the minimum for already using them by various functions now. The best offer
is desired. I don't want to delete the present function...
Therefore, I welcome your suggestion.:-)
Thanks!
Regards,
Hiroshi Saito
From: "Florian G. Pflug" <fgp@phlo.org>
> Dave Page wrote:
>> Hiroshi Saito wrote:
>>> Umm, There may also be structure which debugger is connected with
>>> PostgreSQL by itself and waits for a response, and it may not be
>>> desirable on a constitution.
>>
>> Yeah, that's a good point. In case that doesn't retranslate to German
>> well, what Hiroshi is saying is that users can currently attach the
>> debugger standalone from the command line, so integration might not be
>> the best idea.
>
> OK, so what about a completely different idea. We just build two
> completly independent appbundles, distribute both together, and
> just add code to pgadmin to find the debugger application?
>
> I think OSX has support for this - after all, the finder finds
> the correct application to open a certain file with, even if
> you move the application around on your harddisk.
>
> That only works if mixing different versions of the debugger and
> of pgadmin3 doesn't cause trouble, of course.
>
> Alternatively, we could do both - include the debugger app in the
> pgadmin3 bundle, but also provide it separately.
>
> greetings, Florian Pflug
