Re: [GENERAL] Stored Procedures - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Moray McConnachie
Subject Re: [GENERAL] Stored Procedures
Date
Msg-id 01fa01bf27a2$c6f36b90$760e01a3@oucs.ox.ac.uk
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [GENERAL] Stored Procedures  ("Brett W. McCoy" <bmccoy@lan2wan.com>)
Responses Re: [GENERAL] Stored Procedures  ("Brett W. McCoy" <bmccoy@lan2wan.com>)
List pgsql-general
----- Original Message -----
From: Brett W. McCoy <bmccoy@lan2wan.com>
To: Jeff MacDonald <jeff@hub.org>
Cc: <pgsql-general@postgreSQL.org>
Sent: Friday, November 05, 1999 3:52 PM
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Stored Procedures


> On Fri, 5 Nov 1999, Jeff MacDonald wrote:
>
> > 1: does postgres support stored procedures
>
> Yes, quite extensively, and far beyond what SQL 7 offers.  You may
want
> to take a look at the programmer's manual for the documentation.

I thought we had rather a long debate recently about whether and if
Postgres did/should support stored procedures, and the point was that
it doesn't at the moment?

PL/PgSQL functions are not at all the same thing, although they are
obviously very useful.
Yours,
Moray

----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------
Moray.McConnachie@computing-services.oxford.ac.uk



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Brett W. McCoy"
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Stored Procedures
Next
From: "Gene Sokolov"
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Stored Procedures