Re: bytea vs. pg_dump - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bernd Helmle
Subject Re: bytea vs. pg_dump
Date
Msg-id 01C1F6AB0CFF8A52B30DF0F3@teje
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: bytea vs. pg_dump  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
--On Mittwoch, Mai 06, 2009 19:04:21 -0400 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> 
wrote:

> So I'm now persuaded that a better textual representation for bytea
> should indeed make things noticeably better here.  It would be
> useful though to cross-check this thought by profiling a case that
> dumps a comparable volume of text data that contains no backslashes...

I'm going to try to create a profile with a converted text representation 
of the data.

--  Thanks
                   Bernd


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Greg Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: SELECT ... FOR UPDATE [WAIT integer | NOWAIT] for 8.5
Next
From: Hans-Juergen Schoenig
Date:
Subject: Re: SELECT ... FOR UPDATE [WAIT integer | NOWAIT] for 8.5