> On 16 Jul 2026, at 19:06, Tomas Vondra <tomas@vondra.me> wrote: > > But making the current scheme > faster (particularly the decompression part) would be a huge benefit for > existing systems that can't simply recompress everything. FWIW this spring we took a stab at refactoring old patch [0] about optimizing pglz decompression ideas into several small patches [1] [2]. We stalled when found some regressions and work lost momentum. If anyone is interested - we (me, Nik, Kirk) would be happy to collab. Some enthusiasm could revive that work. Best regards, Andrey Borodin. [0] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/FEF3DC5E-4BC4-44E1-8DEB-DADC67046FE3%40yandex-team.ru [1] https://github.com/NikolayS/pglz-compression/pull/20 [2] https://github.com/NikolayS/pglz-compression/pull/20/changes/dcb12183519c2eda76dfadaac005e12de6ad4e01
pgsql-hackers by date:
Соглашаюсь с условиями обработки персональных данных