Is it at all a problem that several columns in pg_conversion have the same
name as columns in pg_constraint?
Should the ones in pg_conversion become: convname instead of conname, etc.
simply for clarity?
Chris
----- Original Message -----
> Log message:
> Second phase of committing Rod Taylor's pg_depend/pg_constraint patch.
> pg_relcheck is gone; CHECK, UNIQUE, PRIMARY KEY, and FOREIGN KEY
> constraints all have real live entries in pg_constraint. pg_depend
> exists, and RESTRICT/CASCADE options work on most kinds of DROP;
> however, pg_depend is not yet very well populated with dependencies.
> (Most of the ones that are present at this point just replace formerly
> hardwired associations, such as the implicit drop of a relation's pg_type
> entry when the relation is dropped.) Need to add more logic to create
> dependency entries, improve pg_dump to dump constraints in place of
> indexes and triggers, and add some regression tests.
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org
>
