Re: reference problem of manifest.(win32.mak of libpq.dll) - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Hiroshi Saito
Subject Re: reference problem of manifest.(win32.mak of libpq.dll)
Date
Msg-id 017a01c8539d$a66e3370$0d01a8c0@yourc3ftrhkaod
Whole thread Raw
In response to reference problem of manifest.(win32.mak of libpq.dll)  ("Hiroshi Saito" <z-saito@guitar.ocn.ne.jp>)
Responses Re: reference problem of manifest.(win32.mak of libpq.dll)  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
List pgsql-patches
From: "Magnus Hagander" <magnus@hagander.net>

>> I don't think of a good idea. However, since our document has announced
>> officially, saying >=VC7.1. Therefore, I think that it is satisfactory.
>
> Ah, good point, I forgot about that.
>
> But - if we do that, why do we need that IF check *at all*?

It is because it is saved by it although VC6 is private. probably, present all will
be possible by it. I feel that it is better than exclusion for it.

Regards,
Hiroshi Saito

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Revised patch for fixing archiver shutdown behavior
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Revised patch for fixing archiver shutdown behavior