Seems like the debate has flared again.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: "Gunnar Rønning" <gunnar@polygnosis.com>
Cc: "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e@gmx.net>; "Per-Olof Norén" <pelle@alma.nu>;
<pgsql-jdbc@postgresql.org>
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 1:22 AM
Subject: Re: [JDBC] Ant installation (and other) issues!
> Gunnar =?iso-8859-1?q?R=F8nning?= <gunnar@polygnosis.com> writes:
> > But anyway this off topic, what need to have is a build process that
works
> > nicely and I think including the ant binaries(around 500k) would be the
> > best solution here.
>
> 500k of binaries? You just lost the argument. That's not an acceptable
> amount of overhead to add to the Postgres distribution.
I don´t see why the size of ant will be a problem. Could you please explain
to me?
