Re: [ADMIN] Problems with Large Objects using Postgres 7.2.1 - Mailing list pgsql-jdbc

From Chris White
Subject Re: [ADMIN] Problems with Large Objects using Postgres 7.2.1
Date
Msg-id 013701c2feeb$3c8f2920$ff926b80@amer.cisco.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [ADMIN] Problems with Large Objects using Postgres 7.2.1  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-jdbc
Yes we are looking at the ability to recover from a power loss. However, we
only want to recover what we think has been committed to the database.

-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us]
Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2003 3:45 PM
To: cjwhite@cisco.com
Cc: pgsql-jdbc@postgresql.org; pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [JDBC] [ADMIN] Problems with Large Objects using Postgres
7.2.1


"Chris White" <cjwhite@cisco.com> writes:
> Do you think I need to change the sync method for the
> database?

No, that's not relevant unless you are looking at failure to recover
from a power loss.

            regards, tom lane


pgsql-jdbc by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] Problems with Large Objects using Postgres 7.2.1
Next
From: "agnes"
Date:
Subject: traversing an array column