Tom Lane wrote:
> "Michael Paesold" <mpaesold@gmx.at> writes:
>> Can you remember regressions in stable branches in the past?
>
> Yes. Relax. If this were a data-corruption-in-the-backend issue,
> I might feel that it mandates an immediate re-release. But it isn't
> and it doesn't. You'll note that Michael M. himself didn't bother to
> backpatch the fix on first discovery ... so why should anyone else
> take it more seriously?
OK. :-)
Michael Paesold
